DOI: https://doi.org/10.26661/2413-2284-2017-1-37-11
| ПІБ автора(ів) | FULL NAME |
| Палагута Вадим Іванович | Palaguta Vadim |
| УСТАНОВА | AFFILIATION |
| професор, доктор философских наук, заведующий кафедрой инженерной педагогики Национальной Металлургической академии Украины (г. Днепр, Украина) | Professor, Doctor of philosophical Sciences, Manager of Department of Engineering Pedagogics of the National Metallurgical Academy of Ukraine (NMetAU) (Dnipro, Ukraine) |
| НАЗВА СТАТТІ | ARTICLE’S NAME |
| Условия конструирования коллективных идентичностей в дискурсивных практиках субъектов | Constructing conditions of collective identities in subjects’ discursive practices |
| АНОТАЦІЯ | SUMMARY |
| В статье анализируются теоретические принципы концепции дискурсивных практик как важнейших условий формирования коллективных идентичностей. Показано, как использование теоретических принципов социального конструктивизма позволяет лучше понять семантические и прагматические возможности дискурсивных практик как неотъемлемых факторов формирования коллективной идентичности (в том числе и национальной). | The article deals with the theoretical principles of the discursive practices concept as the most important conditions of the collective identities formation. It is shown how the social constructionism theoretical principles usage makes it possible to understand the semantic and pragmatic possibilities of discursive practices as the integral factors of the collective identity formation as well as national one. Social constructionism basic theoretical positions analysis in the collective identity studying aspect makes it possible to establish the social interactions primacy over anything in the social reality, those are being exclusively constituted through discourses by the subjects themselves. It is possible to distinguish the following social constructionism theoretical positions, expanding the possibilities of discourse semantics: discourse conventionality as the antithesis of the mental language «mirror», performativity as the antithesis of constativity, discourse meanings’ contextual determination and creativity as the antithesis of originality and fixedness, locality and situationality as the antithesis of totality and immutability. In this way, social constructivism revises the concept of social relations as a «variable fixedness». The social constructionist approach emphasizes relationality, redefining them through the operational concepts of convention and interchange, continuously implemented in discursive practices. If we look at the concept of «social relations» through the constantly evolving interchanges and interdependencies discourses prism, then we can say that this assumes the continuous confusion, competition and «struggle» of discourses for hegemony, where power competitive relations are the real cause of social relations. These relations eventually lead to a continuous, essentially conflict interaction, and, ideally, to a dialogue of discourses. It is noteworthy that if we consider the social relations and social order from this position they include conventionality, performativity, discourse meanings’ contextual determination and locality as their obligatory condition. It is more appropriate to talk about the discursive intelligibility and multi-contextuality and polysemy, presupposing many interpretations of social reality, their ultimate incompleteness, and the endless discourses competing. Moreover, if discourse statements invite to an endless iconic, conventional and performative game of subjects providing a wealth of meanings, then all the discursive practices acquire authentic meanings at the time of their correlation with other discourses, which implies an extended understanding of the concept of «symbolic» or a kind of pan-symbolism of discursive practices as the social reality and collective identity forming tool. Therefore, the socio-constructionism theoretical positions, which directly relate not only to the semantics of discourse, but primarily to its pragmatics - conventionality, performativity, contextual determination,, creativity, locality and situationality - reveal the semantic possibilities of discursive practices when the subject is constructing the present social reality, and indirectly – the collective identity as something changeable, transitory and determined by the available circumstances of subject’s collective discourse inactivity. In this sense, there is a need to consider the national discourse collective identity as a situational, changeable and conflict provoking process that can never develop itself without any confrontation with the other kind of nationalist discourse. |
| КЛЮЧОВІ СЛОВА | KEYWORDS |
| социальный конструктивизм, коллективные идентичности, социальные отношения, социальная реальность, дискурс, дискурсивные практики. | social constructivism, collective identities, social relations, social reality, discourse, discursive practices. |
| Завантажити повну версію статті | Download full version of the article |
Палагута В.И. Условия конструирования коллективных идентичностей в дискурсивных практиках субъектов / В.И. Палагута // Культурологічний вісник: Науково-теоретичний щорічник Нижньої
Наддніпрянщини / Гол. ред. М.А. Лепський; Запорізький національний університет. – Запоріжжя: КСК-Альянс, 2017. Випуск 37. Том 1. C. 85-93.